THE developer of the Claude chatbot has said that a global pause in the AI race would “likely be a good thing,” warning that cutting-edge models are beginning to show signs they could become increasingly difficult for humans to control.
San Francisco-based Artificial Intelligence (AI) company, in a report, warned that if only one company stopped, rivals would simply race ahead, adding: “We believe it would be good for the world to have the option to slow or temporarily pause frontier AI development to enable societal structures and alignment research to keep up with the advance of the technology.”
Getting a real pause to work would mean multiple major AI companies in multiple countries, most notably the United States (US) and China, all agreeing to stop at the same time, under rules everyone could actually verify, Anthropic said, noting: “Without a global coordination mechanism, companies and governments will have to make difficult decisions about safety while under competitive and geopolitical pressures.”
The BBC reported that the company has faced pushback from others in the industry, and officials in the White House, who say its focus on worst-case scenarios overstates the risks and amounts to a strategy for slowing rivals under the cover of safety concerns.
Still, the White House has acknowledged the power of the company’s Mythos model, which has not been made available to the general public due to its cybersecurity capabilities and is currently deployed only to a small number of vetted organisations.
The proposal would face an uphill battle in Washington and Silicon Valley, where US officials and tech executives have repeatedly argued that any slowdown in AI development risks handing China a decisive strategic edge in what many see as the defining technology race of the century.
US President, Donald Trump, however, said he discussed the possibility of cooperating with China on AI safety issues during his recent visit to Beijing.
He has also signed an executive order that allows the government 30 days to conduct a preliminary review of the most powerful US AI models before their release.
Chinese-linked tech company uses AI to predict who might become a dissident.
Anthropic compared the problem to nuclear arms control treaties, but said it would be even harder to get a handle on, since AI training is far easier to hide than a missile silo, and the temptation to quietly keep going would be enormous.
The company said it plans to bring together government officials, scientists, advocacy groups and competing AI firms in coming months to figure out how such a system could work.
The call for coordination comes alongside internal data showing that AI is already dramatically speeding up the development of AI itself, Anthropic said.
That acceleration creates a feedback loop that Anthropic warned could eventually lead to what researchers call “recursive self-improvement.” That’s the idea of an AI system that becomes capable of essentially teaching itself to get smarter, without much human help.
“We are not there yet, and recursive self-improvement is not inevitable,” the report said, while adding that it could arrive sooner than most governments and institutions are ready for.
“The evidence suggests that the human role is narrowing at each step in the AI development process,” the company alerted.
Published:
Related articles
Recent articles
